The critical and the creative

Frank Auerbach - Sketch: Mornington Crescent (1972)

The South West's perennial problem of how to generate more critical dialogue around the visual arts was addressed once again with the launch of the Art Writers Group at Hestercombe House last week. Originating in a writing workshop organised by Visual Arts South West, the group is co-ordinated by Peter Stiles and Josephine Lanyon and has just appointed four funded writers-in-residence at three locations: Plymouth, Cornwall and Bristol.

We heard from the writers in residence Patrick Langley (Cornwall), Lizzie Lloyd (Plymouth), Tom Jeffreys (Plymouth), and Mary Paterson (Bristol) as well as Phil Owen of Tertulia and Greg Neale of Resurgence magazine.

Topics under discussion included Authorship, Context and Publication. A highlight for me was Mary Paterson performing a text that took in, among other things, the refugee crisis, Vikings, walking and the slipperiness of memory.  I also enjoyed Lizzie Lloyd's conjuring of a painting by Peter Doig purely through words (and a little rhythmic pacing). Plus I got to spend a few precious minutes with a Frank Auerbach sketch in the gallery upstairs.

It was an inspiring day - and an opener to what I hope will be a far wider and deeper discussion, but the emphasis on creative writing in response to contemporary art side-stepped some of the more pressing issues surrounding art writing in relation to the region's art practice. I'm all for opening up the question of what critical writing might be but, to function in support of the visual arts ecology, it needs to be more than yet another creative activity.

The issue for me is that we need more critical dialogue around art. That means people who are prepared to respond rigorously to work in ways that allow its makers, curators and audiences to understand, learn and grow. I'm not arguing for critics as the ultimate arbiters of taste and quality, but about capable writers and speakers deploying integrity and precision in describing their responses.

I'm not saying this can't be done through creative writing, but riffing off of someone else's work to make a text work of your own is not always the same as trying honestly to interpret, and enhance appreciation of, that work. There's a reason why we might prefer to practice slightly oblique creative writing over reviewing - and that's because it's easier to hide what you really think. South West practitioners operate in a very messy, close-knit world where everyone has multiple roles. A writer might also be an artist who in 18 months time will be looking to collaborate with the artists or curators they're about to review.

There are other issues too. Although the subject of money was avoided until the closing minutes at Hestercombe, it is at the heart of how we create a properly critical atmosphere. If you want professional writers, curators, academics and critics to write generously and fairly about art, you need to pay them (or they will be too busy doing their actual jobs to give the art the time and thought it deserves). As paid opportunities for critical writing continue to shrink, it is increasingly the artists and arts organisations themselves who commission texts. Of course this need not actually stifle critical thinking, but we need to be alert to the fact that whoever pays the bill holds the power.

I have written on related topics before, back in 2014 and 2010. See more here:
http://gabriellehoad.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/critical-friends-hard-to-find-harder.html
http://gabriellehoad.blogspot.co.uk/2010/11/good-and-bad-art.html
http://gabriellehoad.blogspot.co.uk/2010/09/is-there-right-way-to-write-about-art.html